Welcome to the archive of past Child-Maltreatment-Research-L (CMRL) list serve messages (11,000+).
The table below contains all past CMRL messages (text only, no attachments) from Nov. 20,
1996 - October 2, 2024 and is updated every two months.
Instructions:
Postings are listed for browsing with the newest messages first. Click on the linked ID number to open a message.
Subject:Re: Development of a well-being measurement tool for 0 to 3-year-olds in Out of Home Care (OOHC) - PhD Research project
Well-being Indicator Tool for Youth (WIT-Y)
cascw.umn.edu
Timothy B. Zuel, MSSW, PhD, LICSW
University of Minnesota
Sent from IPhone
On Aug 11, 2024, at 7:15 PM, Corcoran, Tracey - corty013 wrote:
Hi there,
To guide the development of a measurement tool, my first stage will involve a review of the literature to identify general and widely accepted child well-being frameworks, defining the domains of child well-being.
Critical analysis of the existing widely accepted well-being frameworks will then be undertaken to determine whether they are suitable for young children 0 to 3-years-old in OOHC, noting the need for cultural appropriateness in an Australian context.
It is hypothesised that additional items will be required when considering the well-being of 0 to 3-year-olds in Australian OOHC.
I am wondering, could anyone direct me to child well-being frameworks to explore?
Many thanks,
Tracey
Tracey Corcoran
PhD Candidate
Australian Centre for Child Protection
University of South Australia | Justice & Society
Level 3, 195 North Terrace, Adelaide
GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia. 5001
unisa.edu.au/accp
Well-being Indicator Tool for Youth (WIT-Y)
cascw.umn.edu
Timothy B. Zuel, MSSW, PhD, LICSW
University of Minnesota
Sent from IPhone
On Aug 11, 2024, at 7:15 PM, Corcoran, Tracey - corty013 wrote:
Hi there,
To guide the development of a measurement tool, my first stage will involve a review of the literature to identify general and widely accepted child well-being frameworks, defining the domains of child well-being.
Critical analysis of the existing widely accepted well-being frameworks will then be undertaken to determine whether they are suitable for young children 0 to 3-years-old in OOHC, noting the need for cultural appropriateness in an Australian context.
It is hypothesised that additional items will be required when considering the well-being of 0 to 3-year-olds in Australian OOHC.
I am wondering, could anyone direct me to child well-being frameworks to explore?
Many thanks,
Tracey
Tracey Corcoran
PhD Candidate
Australian Centre for Child Protection
University of South Australia | Justice & Society
Level 3, 195 North Terrace, Adelaide
GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia. 5001
unisa.edu.au/accp
/
